- 229-page censored document released under Freedom of Information Act
- Allegations against Secret Service employees date back to 2004
- Some claims against Secret Service agents reported as recently as last month
- Release of the report comes on the heels of the April prostitution scandal in Colombia
PUBLISHED: 15:02 EST, 15 June 2012 | UPDATED: 15:02 EST, 15 June 2012
The U.S. government has revealed details of serious allegations against Secret Service agents and officers going back to 2004, among them claims of involvement with prostitutes, leaking sensitive information, publishing pornography, sexual assault, illegal wiretaps, improper use of weapons and drunkenness.
The heavily censored 229-page document was released with little fanfare under the U.S. Freedom of Information Act on the heels of the embarrassing Secret Service prostitution scandal that erupted in April in Colombia.
It describes accusations filed against Secret Service agents with the Homeland Security Department’s inspector general.
Some of the accusations occurred as recently as last month. In many cases, the government noted that some of the claims were resolved administratively, and others were being formally investigated.
The new disclosures of so many serious accusations lend weight to concerns expressed by Congress that the prostitution scandal exposed a culture of misconduct within the agency charged with protecting the U.S. president and other top officials.
Secret Service Director Mark Sullivan apologized for the incident during a hearing in May but insisted that what happened in Colombia was an isolated case.
Secret Service officials did not immediately respond Friday to questions about the accusations.
MORE SECRET SERVICE CLAIMS
—October 2011: An employee was accused of sending harassing messages to a woman who interpreted them to be sexual harassment.
—March 2011: A complaint was filed involving embezzlement or theft of public money. Nearly the entire entry was censored save for a notation that it was adjudicated by a judge.
—October 2010: An employee was implicated in a national security leak. The details were censored, and the records didn’t include a disposition of the case.
—May 2012: An employee was accused of contributing to the delinquency of a minor. No details were provided, other than that the case was closed administratively.
—May 2012: An officer was videotaped, twice, wandering nude around an apartment complex.
—January 2011: Police in New York arrested an investigative support assistant on charges sexual abuse. The records do not list an outcome for the case.
—2005: An armed agent was accused of threatening to shut down a strip club because it was charging $40 for lap dances and $25 for table-side dances, which the agent said was against federal law. The incident was reported in May 2012.
The complaints included an alleged sexual assault reported in August of 2011. In the heavily redacted entry, an agent was accused of pushing a female co-worker onto a bed during a work trip.
The employee ‘got on top of (censored) attempting to have sex,’ even though the woman ‘told (censored) ‘no’ several times.’ The entry noted that supervisors described the accused as ‘a conscientious and dependable employee.’ The incident was closed with an ‘administrative disposition’ in February.
They also included an anonymous complaint in October of 2003 that a Secret Service agent ‘may have been involved with a prostitution ring,’ noting that two telephone numbers belonging to the unnamed agent, who has since retired, turned up as part of an FBI investigation into a prostitution ring.
In addition, in 2005, an employee was reported to the Washington field office for being arrested on a charge of solicitation in a park. Documents do not reveal the outcome of that case.
In 2008, an on-duty uniform division officer was arrested in a Washington prostitution sting. The officer, who was driving a marked Secret Service vehicle at the time, was placed on administrative leave, according to the released records.
Sullivan said during the May hearing that the officer was later fired.
Some of the allegations were obviously false, such as a complaint in August of 2010 that a Secret Service agent had performed experiments and implanted stimulators in a citizen’s brain.
The list also included dozens of complaints about fraudulent emails that circulate widely on the Internet and appear to come from the Secret Service.
A dozen Secret Service officers, agents and supervisors were implicated in the Colombia scandal and eight have been forced out of the agency. At least two employees are fighting to get their jobs back.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2160010/Prostitutes-pornography-boozing-information-leaks-U-S-government-reveals-DOSSIER-OF-SHAME-Secret-Service-agents-dating-2004.html#ixzz1xtaPHYFb